ATHOL DICKSON

  • The Latest
  • Theology
  • Culture
  • Finance
  • Literature

How to Conduct Due Diligence For A Crowdfunded Hard Money Loan

December 6, 2016 By Athol Dickson

Crowdfunded Hard Money Loans due diligence
Successful crowdfunded hard money lending depends on your due diligence.

Investing in so-called “hard money” loans is an excellent way to achieve significant income if it’s done in a way that controls risk. In a couple of earlier posts which you can read here and here, I discussed reasons why I’m investing in loans through crowdfunding platforms like Patch of Land and PeerStreet, and four criteria I look for in every loan. With this post, I’ll explain how I perform more detailed due diligence on loans that meet those four criteria.

The goal here is to verify that the underlying property is really worth as much as the crowdfunding platform claims. If it’s not, then the property can’t be sold for enough money to repay my investment. I look for a “loan-to’value” ratio (LTV) of at least 75%, meaning the loan amount is 75% (or less) of the market value of the underlying property. That way there’s a 25% cushion if the borrower defaults, meaning it should be possible to foreclose and sell the property for 25% more than the loan amount. Of course there are fees and holding costs associated with foreclosures, so in the real world I’d do well to get all of my investment back after those costs, but with a 75% LTV I have a fighting chance of breaking even or maybe even showing a small profit. That’s not a bad worst case scenario in today’s investing climate.

Patch of Land and PeerStreet both state the underlying property’s value when they post a deal on their platforms, and those valuations are done by professional appraisers or real estate brokers. I still go to the trouble of double checking the property value anyway, and on several occasions I’ve determined that their stated property values were too high. I don’t believe Patch of Land or PeerStreet would overstate a value deliberately. On the contrary, I think they’re both ethical companies, or I wouldn’t invest with them. Rather, real estate valuation is an inexact process due to the influence of numerous intangible factors. Therefore, just as I would never invest in common stock based solely on the information in a company’s own shareholder’s report, so I would never invest in a crowdfunding platform’s loan without looking outside of the platform’s data to confirm the investment’s value.

Here’s how I do it:

The goal is to compare the underlying property’s valuation to the sold prices of comparable recently sold properties in the immediate area. We want to make sure the average price of the most similar “sold comps” at least equals the crowdfunding platform’s valuation. For most properties, the information on sold comps is available online at websites like Realtor.com, Zillow, or Redfin. If you can’t find the underlying property on those sites, or if you can’t find recently sold comps in the immediate area of the underlying property, you should probably not make the loan.

Realtor.com and Zillow cover the entire USA as far as I can tell, while Redfin’s coverage area is more limited. But I prefer to use Redfin whenever possible, because in most of its covered cities it provides sold comp information in a list format which can be downloaded as a spreadsheet for more detailed analysis. So to follow along as I demonstrate the process, step one is to open Redfin.com.

If you clicked the Redfin link you should have their home page open in a new window. In this example, we will assume the underlying property address is 2926 Searchwood Dr., Jacksonville, FL 32277. Copy and paste that address into the search bar on Redfin’s home page and press your enter key.

You should now be looking at Redfin’s page for the house at that address. Scroll down until you see a map with the house indicated by a blue icon. Below the map click the “Map Nearby Homes For Sale” link. Click the link.

Crowdfunded Hard Money Loans due diligence
Find this map on the 2926 Searchwood Dr page and click the link

A new page will open which displays another map showing actively listed properties on the left, and a corresponding list of the same properties on the right. Let’s focus first on the map. The farther away a sold comp is located from the subject property the less valid it is, so zoom in on the map until it displays an area about six to eight blocks wide around the subject property. In this case, just click the “+” box once.

It’s also important to avoid comps in different neighborhoods, so if the map shows a major road or highway, a river, or other natural boundary which might form a separation between the subject property’s neighborhood and a different neighborhood, we’ll need to move the map view around to ensure that it displays as little of the other neighborhood as possible. Do this by hovering your cursor over the map, “grab” the map with a double click (tap twice and hold after the second tap). Then move the map view until the intersection of Merrill Rd. and Cesery Blvd. is at the extreme lower left. Notice as you move the map the houses listed on the right may change. This should ensure that no properties on the wrong side of those two major roads will appear in your results.

Crowdfunded Hard Money Loans due diligence
Adjust the map as shown, then click the link.

Now that you have zeroed in on the immediate area of the subject property, and made sure not to include any areas which look like they could be considered a different neighborhood, it’s time to replace the active listings with sold listings. Do that by clicking on the “More Filters” link at the upper right above the list.

The advanced filters menu should now be displayed. In the left column deselect every Property Type except for “House.” Select “Sale Records.” Finally, go through the “Home Facts” options to narrow the search to a set of metrics which closely match the subject property. For example, in this case the house size is 1304 square feet, so I selected a minimum square feet of 1000 and a maximum of 1750. The subject property has three bedrooms and 1.5 baths so I selected those options as well. the house was built in 1950 so I selected 1940 to 1960 under “Year Built.” You get the idea.

Finally, next to the “Sale Records” button is a drop down menu that lets you select a date range for the sold comps. Select “last 3 months.” Click “Update Search” and check the map to see how many sold comps appear. If there are fewer than five or so, go back to “More Filters” and increase the sale records period to “last 6 months.” If there still aren’t enough comps, try “last 1 year.” Be sure to pick the briefest period possible to generate enough comps ,because the more recent a comp is, the more accurate the comp is.

Crowdfunded Hard Money Loans due diligence
Use the filter to find recently sold properties that closely match the subject property,

When you’re ready, click the orange “Update Search” button. The “More Filters” menu goes away and you should be looking at the map and list again, except now the icons on the map are all blue, indicating sold properties. Scroll down to the bottom of the properties list on the right. Clink the “download all” link just below the list. This will download a Microsoft Excel file directly to your computer. It’s in a .csv file format which should work with most kinds of spreadsheet software. Find and open the file.

I would never invest in a crowdfunding platform’s loan without looking outside of the platform’s data to confirm the investment’s value.

Find the “URL” column and use the links below to open each property’s individual webpage. Review the photos and written information for each of them to compare their condition to the subject property. If the condition or amenities are substantially better or worse than the subject property, you’ll have to add or subtract dollars from that comp’s sold price to make it a better match. For example, the subject property has no swimming pool, so if one of the comps shows a pool, you should lower the sold price accordingly for that comp. But the subject property has clearly been remodeled inside and out, with new flooring, paint, roof, and so forth. If you find a comp that’s a total “fixer” you’ll need to either delete it, or add the value of a remodel to the sold price for that comp. To do that simply go to the “Price” column and make the adjustment. (If you don’t know how, click here for a basic Excel primer.) The amount you add or subtract will be somewhat subjective, because the market value of a swimming pool or a new roof will vary from market to market. You may need to do some research. In most markets you can find real estate agent blogs that discuss the going rate for such improvements.

Once you’ve reviewed all of the sold comps and made adjustments to the price to ensure that they’re “apples to apples” comparisons to the subject property, it’s time to calculate the market value. The formula for this is simple:

(Average Sold Price / Average Square Feet) x Subject Property Square Feet.

 So you find the average of all the entries in the “Price” column, divide that by the average of all the property sizes in the “”SqFt” column, and multiply the result by the size in square feet of the subject property. That’s your valuation. (To learn how to use the “average” function in Excel, click here.)

Now divide the crowdfunding platform’s loan amount by your own valuation amount. If the result is a loan-to-value (LTV) of 75% or less, chances are that the crowdfunding site’s valuation of the underlying property is solid, and you may want to invest. (Although you should also factor in your own criteria, and the LTV is just one of many risk points to consider, as I have pointed out before.) If your LTV is more than 75%, you should consider the possibility that the crowdfunding site has overvalued the property, and if you trust your own valuation, you may not want to invest. I wouldn’t.


For more on this subject, click here and here.

I received no consideration of any kind from Peer Street, Patch of Land, or Redfin for this blog post.

See disclaimer at bottom of page.

 

Why It’s Good We’re Not a Democracy

November 22, 2016 By Athol Dickson

Should we change the Constitution because of Donald Trump?
Should we change the Constitution because of Donald Trump?

Ever since the astonishing 2016 presidential election results began to sink in, the news media has been covering protests, riots, tearful interviews, and social media rants against both Donald Trump and the Electoral College. Meanwhile, it has been widely reported that Hillary Clinton won the “popular vote.” Trump is only the president-elect because the Founders chose a republic form of government, with Americans represented by a “college” of “electors” who are guided by our votes. Because of the way the number of electors are determined under this system, some states like California have fewer electors per capita than other states with lower populations. meaning sometimes a minority of Americans has more influence over the electoral college. Clinton supporters say this is fundamentally unfair and now, 229 years after the Founders signed the Constitution which established our nation as a republic, some want to change to system to a real democracy, by which they mean pure majority rule.

At first blush, this sounds okay. After all, only fascists, commies and dictators don’t like democracy. If more Americans voted for Clinton, why shouldn’t she be our next President? So let’s change the system. What could possibly go wrong?

Well, a couple of things, actually, and they’re both pretty awful. For example, check out this pie chart:

Popular Vote, 2016
Popular Vote, 2016

There you have an accurately scaled depiction of the difference between the total votes cast for Trump (in red) and Clinton (in blue). See the difference? Look carefully or you’ll miss it.

As of today The New York Times reports 1,265,379 more people voted for Clinton. That sounds like a lot until you consider that the Times also reports there were 123,517,291 total ballots cast. So the difference is only 1.02% of the total votes. That is well within the statistical margin of error of virtually any system capable of counting so many individual decisions.

Also remember that only half of the 1,265,379 difference would need to move over to the Trump column to make the election a tie. In other words, Trump came within one half of one percent of getting exactly the same number of votes as Clinton. Put another way, only one American out of 200 would have to change their vote to make it a tie. It’s entirely possible for that many of us to cast a vote for the wrong candidate by accident.

As things stand now, even with an electoral college result that leaves the nation in no doubt about who won the election a fringe element has been rioting about the election. Imagine what might happen if the decision rested on a popular vote this close. Would anyone trust the results enough to accept them? Or would there be bitterly contested recounts dragging on for months, and battles in the streets from coast to coast? As ugly as things have been the last two weeks, I think it’s very possible we’d see anarchy without a clear cut winner. So this is the first reason why it’s good our country isn’t governed purely by majority rule: the current system allows us to avoid the chaos that could easily arise after elections where difference between the majority and minority is so small.

…let’s change the system. What could possibly go wrong?

Next, consider this: according to The Gallup Poll, in 1937, only a third of Americans indicated they were willing to vote for a woman for president. Since the population was divided roughly 50/50 between the genders, apparently even many females back then didn’t believe a woman was up to the job. In fact, it wasn’t until 1955 that the majority of Americans said they would seriously consider a female candidate.

Also, in 1938 only 38% of Americans would have voted for a black person for president. It wasn’t until 1964 that a majority of Americans said they would support a black candidate. And it’s safe to wonder if they really meant it even then, since no black person won a major party’s nomination for the job until 2008.

Perhaps you see where I’m going. These dismaying figures hint at a danger with a “pure” democracy that seldom gets discussed. In a country ruled strictly by majority rule, who will stand up for those in the minority?

John Adams referred to this problem as the “tyranny of the majority.” He wrote, “We may appeal to every page of history we have hitherto turned over, for proofs irrefragable, that the people, when they have been unchecked, have been as unjust, tyrannical, brutal, barbarous and cruel as any king or senate possessed of uncontrollable power…” (John Adams, letter to Thomas Jefferson, November 13, 1815).

In modern times there is perhaps no better illustration of Adams’s concern than this one:

1933 German Election Results
1933 German Election Results

The brown bar at the top is the clear winner in terms of the German popular vote in 1933 (their last free election prior to WWII). NSDAP stand for Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, also known as the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, or the Nazis.

So much for the fairness of majority rule.

There have been several calls for the electoral college to vote against the election results and put Clinton in office. If those on the extreme left wing were correct about Donald Trump, if he truly was Hitler as some of them claim to believe, I would also be calling for the electors to go rogue. Fortunately, Trump is not Hitler. But it’s good to know our republic has a safety valve to keep people out of the Oval Office who really are like Hitler, even if someday the majority of Americans decide to express their inner Nazi at the polling place.

 

Road Trip!

November 18, 2016 By Athol Dickson

Road trip!
The USA is gorgeous!

The Lovely Sue and I just returned from a little road trip, 2252 miles not counting the occasional detour. She has family in Kansas, so we headed that way first, then over to Colorado, and down to New Mexico. We were half way through on election day. It was an excellent reminder that no matter who won, the world would go on spinning. And what a beautiful world it is! Just look at a few of the photos we took along the way…

Sangre de Cristo Mountains
Sangre de Cristo Mountains
Mesa Verde Kiva
Mesa Verde Kiva
New Mexico Canyon
New Mexico Canyon
Taos Sunset
Taos Landscape
Santa Fe Sunset
Santa Fe Sunset

The Top 100 Most Damaging Wikileaks (so far)

October 31, 2016 By Athol Dickson

The Top 100 Most Damaging Wikileaks (so far)
Something’s rotten in Washington.

There are just too many Wikileaks emails. Because the volume is overwhelming, many of us have chosen to ignore them. And because the corrupt news media is directly implicated by so many of the emails, you won’t see much coverage on television or in the papers. Fortunately, over on Reddit they’ve been working hard to organize the emails released by Wikileaks into format we can internalize pretty easily. Now someone who calls himself (or herself) “LegendaryAmerican” has published the top 100 most damning emails so you can read them for yourself and see for yourself what we’re dealing with. If you’re an American, and you believe no one should be above the law, you owe it to yourself and to your country to click here and do some reading before you vote.

If you don’t have time for that, here are just 25 of the topics discussed by Clinton staffers, and you can read their emails for yourself at that link above:

  1. Hillary Clinton dreams of completely “open borders”
  2. Hillary Clinton received money from and supported nations that she KNEW funded ISIS and terrorists
  3. Admitting they pay people to incite violence and unrest at Trump rallies
  4. Hillary’s campaign wants “unaware” and “compliant” citizens
  5. Top Hillary aides mock Catholics for their faith
  6. Hillary deleted her incriminating emails. State covered it up. Asked about using White House executive privilege to hide from Congress.
  7. Bribery: King of Morocco gave Clinton Foundation $12 million for a meeting with Hillary, 6 months later Morocco gets weapons
  8. State Department tried to bribe FBI to un-classify Clinton emails (FBI docs)
  9. Hillary caught on tape talking about rigging the Palestine election (audio)
  10. Latinos are “needy”. Latino outreach is “taco bowl engagement”
  11. Clinton campaign was in direct communication with DOJ regarding Hillary’s investigation
  12. Bill Clinton receives $1 million “birthday gift” from ISIS-funding Qatar while Hillary was SoS, Qatar receives arms flow increases of  1,482%
  13. Hillary campaign wishes shooters in news stories were white
  14. Rigging the primaries against Bernie Sanders (DNC favored Hillary)
  15. Clinton Foundation schemed with Big Pharma: keep the price of  AIDS drugs high in America and NO to cheaper generic versions
  16. Democrats created fake Trump “grope under the meeting table” Craigslist employment ad in May 2016
  17. Hillary’s camp excited about a black teen’s murder (to help her agenda)
  18. Rigging media polls through oversampling
  19. “Bill Clinton Inc.” How millions of dollars were raised for the Clintons. Blurred lines between personal and Foundation money
  20. Admitting terrorists will infiltrate the Syrian refugee program
  21. List of reporters that Hillary wined and dined, including biggest journalists and pundits of CNN, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, NY Times, and a lot more. Off the record.
  22. Democrats using American lobbyists to money launder foreign donations illegally
  23. Racist remarks about Blacks and Muslims
  24. Hillary’s poor health (collapsing, memory loss, drug research)
  25. Hillary’s staff admitting she is “tainted” and “really vulnerable” on corruption and bribery

 

 

« Previous Page
Next Page »
With regard to what I’ve written here, I know a little about a lot, a lot about a little, more than some when it comes to some things, less than others about others, and everything there is to know except for what I don’t.

Older Posts

  • Letter to a Disappointed Friend
  • American Success Story
  • Slave Labor Here and Now
  • When Motives Don’t Matter
  • Lies and the Lying Liars Who Publish Them
  • Design Is Like Riding a Bike
  • Right of Way
  • Give Like a Smarty
  • How to Conduct Due Diligence For A Crowdfunded Hard Money Loan
  • Why It’s Good We’re Not a Democracy

This site is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com

Secondary


The Gospel According to Moses

  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Vemo

  • Pinterest

  • Linkedin

  • Rss

  • Tumblr

Copyright © 2025 Author Author Inc. | Website Design by Robin | [footer_backtotop href="#"]